top of page
  • Writer's pictureThe Hindu

Cement cartel case: Delhi High Court allows Builders Association of India to approach CCI

vibrant abstract graphic depicting cement cartel case where AnantLaw has been involved since the very beginning

This news report was authored and published by The Hindu on 26 September 2022. It talks about a case represented by AnantLaw.


In its earlier order, Competition Commission of India refused BAI’s request to implead it as an “interested party”

The Delhi High Court on Monday disposed off a plea filed by Builders Association of India (BAI) challenging a CCI order which declined to implead BAI as an “interested party” in the ongoing cement cartel case.

While disposing the plea Justice Yashwant Verma allowed BAI to approach CCI with the request.

In its petition before the Delhi High Court, BAI alleged that the sudden increase in the price of cement, particularly in the southern region, was abnormal and defied economic factors, being an outcome of cartelisation amongst cement manufacturers.

Earlier, in 2019, CCI ordered investigation into the alleged cartelisation by cement companies. 

This is the second occasion when the CCI is looking into allegations related to cartelisation by cement companies.

Earlier, in 2016, on a complaint filed by BAI before CCI against cement firms and Cement Manufacturers Association (CMA) alleging cartelisation, CCI found ten cement companies and their trade association (CMA) in contravention of the provisions of Competition Act, 2002 that prohibit anti-competitive agreements including cartels.

It was noted by CCI in its order that the cement companies used the platform provided by CMA and shared details relating to prices, capacity utilisation, production and dispatch and thereby restricted production and supplies in the market, contravening the provisions of competition law.

Further, CCI also found the cement companies to be acting in concert in fixing prices of cement. Accordingly, CCI imposed a cumulative penalty of ₹6,300 crore upon top ten cement companies and their trade association (CMA). 

If found guilty of cartelisation by CCI, cement companies may potentially face stiff penalties which may extend up to three times of their profit for each year of the continuance of cartel or ten percent of their turnover for each year of the continuance of the cartel, whichever is higher.

Client: Builders Association of India
Ultratech Cement Ltd. v. Competition Commission of India & Anr.
Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. v. Competition Commission of India & Ors.
India Cements Ltd. v Competition Commission of India & Ors.

AnantLaw Briefings

bottom of page